Posts

Showing posts with the label dating

Sexting Or Perversion

The Radio host asked the man if he had ever asked the woman to show him her pussy when they were dating online. At stake was ten thousand US Dollars he had used to build/repair a house in Isabela. Cabaccan was the Philippine woman who had accepted the Cayman Island Man's money to start building a home for her family while she was out of the country working in Singapore.  The man they call Idol wasn't being as crass and rude as it may sound when asking about the guy wanting to see the OFW's puki.  The de facto TV personality judge Raffy Tulfo was trying to determine if it was abusive or an act of intimacy related to sexting..Both parties can get their sexual releases taken care of without fear of Sexually Transmitted Disease STD or transmission of COVID!  It is very clear to this Canadian that Emelyn was using the guy to help support her family with no intention of ever meeting him in person. Moreover Emelyn's sister was not trustworthy aiding and abetting the scam to...

Another Slacker Boyfriend taking advantage of Girlfriend

I empathized with sexy Julianne Busch who appeared on the wildly popular court TV show starring the supercilious, haughty, midget female judge. Miss Busch had financially supported the lowlife that she had chosen as some sort of interim mate.  Mr Castaneda, probably a bisexual based partially on the ostentatious earring he donned, legally exploited Julianne making sure all the vehicle financing information was in her name while he enjoyed full usage of the car.  Miss Busch eloquently argued that her indolent live-in boyfriend was morally obligated to share some of the monetary responsibility for vehicle financed in Julianne's name. Magistrate Sheindlin ruled against her. Her unaccountable, immoral boyfriend took advantage of the well known moral-legal dichotomy financially victimizing his hard working girl friend. 

Fake Dates with Match.Com Employee

Mr Evans trusted Match.com to find his soul mate or at least an authentic date! Much of what follows was reported in Houston newspaper way back in in April of 2004.  A Match employee revealed a deceptive tactic that was executed just before the expiration of a client's subscription. In order to improve customer retention, a Match.com employee would go on "a date" with a subscriber just prior to subscriber's expiration date. Now that is cold! Somebody is paying their hard earned money to meet a future wife and Match is NOT honest enough to let them know they are striking out. They are effectively acting as a legal prostitution ring by sending out one of their employees to date the poor person who does not know he/she is on an inauthentic date.  The "employee date" will know exactly what to say on the date due to information revealed to Match by the subscriber. What the hell happened to that 29 dimensions of compatibility that these online advertisers p...